Question 1

Is it mandatory to install a lifebuoy where there is free access to water?

Accepted Answer

Placing lifebuoys along waterways and public waterside areas where there is free access to the water can significantly improve safety. In areas where swimming is officially permitted, the presence of a lifebuoy is mandatory following the amendment of the VLAREM regulations (Belgian environmental legislation).Even in locations where swimming is not allowed or explicitly prohibited, it is strongly recommended to install sufficient lifebuoys along the waterfront. This is crucial to ensure that passers-by – such as cyclists or pedestrians – can be rescued in the event they accidentally fall into the water.In addition, we recommend working closely with local authorities and emergency services to ensure that the lifebuoys can be effectively deployed in case of emergency.

Question 2

Does the presence of lifebuoys create a false sense of security?

Accepted Answer

In some cases, the presence of lifebuoys can indeed give people a false sense of security, especially if they do not fully understand how to use them, or if they underestimate the risks associated with a particular waterside location.It is important to emphasise that lifebuoys are emergency tools. They are not a guarantee of safety. People must remain aware that water can pose serious dangers, particularly when someone ends up in it unintentionally.It is therefore essential that individuals understand how to use life buoys correctly and refrain from reckless behaviour in the vicinity of water. It is the responsibility of the authorities and site owners to ensure that appropriate safety measures are implemented and that the public is properly informed about the associated risks and safety procedures. Consequently, it is equally important to conduct educational campaigns to raise awareness of water safety and the correct use of lifesaving equipment.

Question 3

As a safety measure, we have installed a “No Swimming” sign in our municipality. Isn’t that sufficient from a legal standpoint?

Accepted Answer

While a “No Swimming” sign is certainly important to warn the public and raise awareness about potential dangers or risks, placing a lifebuoy is by no means excessive — in fact, it is an essential additional safety measure that can help save a life in an emergency.Combining warning signs with lifebuoys or lifebuoy cabinets significantly improves overall safety near water and ensures that immediate assistance can be provided when needed.Installing a lifebuoy is not only a responsible choice — it is a necessary measure to ensure that help is available in critical situations where every second counts.

Question 4

Can a public or private (legal) entity be held liable in the event of drowning if no or insufficient preventive or rescue equipment is present?

Accepted Answer

Liability in the event of drowning depends on several factors, including the specific laws and regulations applicable in the jurisdiction concerned, as well as the particular circumstances of the case.In general, every individual or entity has a duty of care to ensure the safety of the area for which they are responsible. If no or clearly insufficient preventive or rescue equipment is available, this may result in liability due to negligenceor lack of due diligence, particularly if a drowning occurs and a legal claim for damages is brought forward.

Question 5

What are the regulations concerning the presence of lifesaving equipment near accessible waters in other European countries?

Accepted Answer

Regulations regarding the presence of lifesaving equipment near accessible bodies of water vary across European countries. However, in general, most jurisdictions require the presence of appropriate rescue equipment at waterside locations. It may be mandatory to provide lifejackets, lifebuoys, or other suitable lifesaving devices, particularly in areas where swimming, water sports, or professional activities near water take place.It is always advisable to check the specific local rules and regulations applicable in each country or region. Complying with such regulations contributes directly to the safety of all those working near or enjoying open water. In the absence of clearly defined legal requirements, authorities and site managers should rely on the principle of due care and apply sound judgement to ensure adequate water safety provisions are in place.

Question 6

Do urban planning and design consultancies take into account the placement of preventive or rescue equipment near water to protect citizens and visitors?

Accepted Answer

Urban design and planning consultancies involved in the development of public spaces should indeed take into accountthe installation of preventive and rescue equipment near water in order to safeguard the safety of both citizens and visitors. Implementing appropriate measures to prevent drownings and to ensure rapid intervention in emergency situations is of vital importance.This is especially relevant in the context of increasing urbanisation, and in cities or municipalities located near water. It is a key consideration when designing infrastructure and public environments. The installation of lifebuoys, ladders, or warning signs can be life-saving, and should therefore receive due attention in the planning and layout of public spaces adjacent to water.

Question 7

Is there a standard risk assessment for determining whether a public waterside area is safe?

Accepted Answer

Indeed, there are standard methods and approaches for carrying out risk assessments related to water safety. A commonly used method is risk assessment, in which potential hazards and vulnerabilities are identified and analysed to identify risks.When assessing the safety of waterfront public spaces, factors such as water depth, flow, water quality, accessibility, lighting and potential floodplain can be considered.It is important to consult water safety and risk assessment experts for a thorough analysis and to implement appropriate management measures to ensure the safety of waterfront public spaces.

Question 8

What is the economic cost of drowning in the EU?

Accepted Answer

According to a 2022 report by the United Nations, the economic cost of drowning in the European Union exceeds €1.3 billion per year.These costs include emergency response operations, medical treatment, loss of productivity, legal expenses, and other related expenditures.The financial burden associated with drowning is therefore substantial — another compelling reason why prevention is essential, not only to save lives, but also to reduce its significant economic impact.

Question 9

What are the economic and financial losses and consequences of drowning?

Accepted Answer

The economic and financial losses resulting from drowning incidents are considerable. Firstly, there are the costs associated with rescue operations and search efforts for missing persons following a drowning. Researchers estimate that the cost of a single rescue operation may average between €5,000 and €10,000 per hour. In addition, there are the expenses related to medical treatment and rehabilitation for survivors. These costs can escalate significantly, particularly when the individual suffers long-term health consequences as a result of the incident.Drownings also have indirect economic consequences, such as the loss of productivity and working hours of victims, the impact on the mental health of family members and friends, and the cost of prosecution and trial of any negligent parties.All in all, the economic and financial losses and consequences of drownings can be significant and it is therefore important to take preventive measures and raise public awareness around water safety.

#RespectTheWater

GFE as an organisation

The GFE Products

Documentation & Sensitisation

Frequently Asked Questions